Coronavirus, Part 3: Dark agenda behind the Covid narrative

Kobus du Plessis
May 30, 2020
18 min read

Updated: 7 days ago

This post originally formed part of Coronavirus, Part 2: Sick Until Proven Healthy. To fully understand the context and ideas discussed here, it is best read as a continuation of that article.

Dr. Pierre Kory of the FLCCC Alliance, believes the suppression of IVM's efficacy against Covid19 has cost hundreds of thousands of people their lives, as was echoed by Dr. Zelenko in regards to the suppression of his Hydroxychloroquin protocol. With the proof of their clinical evidence, backed by objective research data, one cannot come to any other sound conclusion except that of a very powerful dark agenda behind the false Covid19 narrative. An agenda which benefited from falsified excessive numbers of Covid19 as cause of death, higher Covid mortality rates, and the suppression of effective treatments for Covid.

Update:

Dr Peter McCullough, cardiologist and Vice Chief of Medicine at Baylor University Medical Centre in Dallas, with more than 600 citations in the National Library of Medicine, has been a pioneer in the treatment of Covid patients since 2020 with a multi-drug protocol. He has testified before the Texas State Senate and Congress about Covid19 treatments and 'vaccine' safety. He says 85 percent of the more than 600,000 U.S. deaths could have been prevented with a multi-drug treatment given in the early to mid-stages of the disease. (53)

“It seems to me, early on, there was an intentional, very comprehensive, suppression of early treatment in order to promote fear, suffering, isolation, hospitalization and death,” Dr McCullough said. “And it seemed to be completely organized and intentional in order to create acceptance for, and then promote mass vaccination.” (54)

Pharmaceutical companies were able to negotiate FDA approval of their Covid19 'vaccines' without having passed stage 3 clinical trials, only if granted an emergency use authorization, or EUA. For an EUA to be granted there firstly needs to be an official public health emergency, like a pandemic. As already shown, the lack of statistical evidence of a pandemic (at least since early 2021), has been covered up by creating a 'casedemic'. Another important condition for issuing an EUA is that “there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives” to the product being authorized. Therefore, although the already mentioned treatment protocols including Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine with Zinc, Nebulized Hydrogen Peroxide, Vitamin D, and other Covid19 treatments have proven to be totally “adequate”, denying them official “approval”, allows the administering of experimental 'vaccines'.

Apart from the HUGE amounts of money to be made by administering Covid19 'vaccines' to billions of people, these 'vaccines' also serves as a vehicle for much bigger objectives. We will delve deeper into these dark motives and the covert role players behind them in Part 3 of this writing. Suffice to say, the vaccines were not created for Covid19, rather Covid19 was created for the vaccines... As Dr McCullough states: "We became conditioned, after about May [2020] or so, to wear a mask, wait in isolation and be saved by the vaccine. And wait for the vaccine. And all we could hear about [was] the vaccine."

The savior "vaccine"

So, let's talk about this savior 'vaccine'. Firstly, it is critically important to mention that the Covid19 jabs are not actually vaccines, according to the legal medical definition of what a vaccine is. The CDC defines a vaccine as “a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease.” A one step process. Immunity in turn is defined as: “If you are immune to a disease, you can be exposed to it without becoming infected.” While the Covid19 injections are being called “vaccines” by news agencies, politicians and the majority of medical professionals, the actual patents for Pfizer’s and Moderna’s injections more truthfully describe them as “gene therapy”.

Update:

Around September 2021 the CDC quietly changed the definition of a vaccine to "a preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases". Immunity in turn is now defined as "protection from an infectious disease". How convenient to change the legal definition to solve any objections to the legality of a specific therapeutic. (55)

What's the significance of the definition, you may ask? Well, by labeling these jabs as “vaccines”, the uninformed public attach the same expectations to them as they have developed to previous vaccines. In other words, people expect the Covid19 jabs to protect them from getting Covid, and thus to curb the spread of the virus, making it an easier decision for them to stand in line. However, neither Moderna nor Pfizer claim their Covid19 'vaccines' to provide immunity. In fact, they did not even test for immunity in their clinical trials. Unlike real vaccines, which use an antigen of the disease you’re trying to prevent, or “a preparation of a killed or attenuated living microorganism, or fraction thereof“ (Washington state code definition), the Covid19 injections contain synthetic RNA messengers encapsulated in a nano-lipid carrier compound, with the sole purpose to lessen clinical symptoms associated with the spike protein, not the actual virus. (56)

Another reason for the general trust in these Covid19 jabs, was the intentional misrepresentation of the vaccine clinical trial data by only reporting relative risk reduction (RRR), and not absolute risk reduction (ARR). While the Pfzier/BioNTech vaccine (BNT162b2) and the Moderna vaccine mRNA-1273 was reported to be 95% and 94% “effective”, based on their RRR, there was no public mention of their ARR rates, which was 0.84% and 1% respectively. 

The ARR rate refers to the difference between the percentage of people in the placebo group (the unvaccinated: 18,325) who contracted Covid, and the percentage of people in the vaccinated group (18,198) who contracted Covid: 0.88% - 0.04% = 0.84%. In other words, less than 1% in both groups contracted the virus... The RRR rate refers to the statistical relative difference between 0.88% and 0.04%, which was calculated at 95%. Due to the small number of people infected with Covid in both groups, this is a 'weak' number which has very limited application in real life. (57, 58)

When considring the ARR of each group, the results look far less impressive. (59)

A paper published by Ronald B. Brown in February 2021, Outcome Reporting Bias in COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Clinical Trials, states that, “because the ARR and RRR can be dramatically different in the same trial, it is necessary to include both measures when reporting efficacy outcomes to avoid outcome reporting bias.” He goes on to say that “omitting absolute risk reduction findings in public health and clinical reports of vaccine efficacy is an example of outcome reporting bias, which ignores unfavorable outcomes and misleads the public’s impression and scientific understanding of a treatment’s efficacy and benefits.” Due to the well known fact that the RRR can be misleading, the FDA's official guidelines to drug companies on the presentation of trial data states the following:

“Provide absolute risks, not just relative risks. Patients are unduly influenced when risk information is presented using a relative risk approach; this can result in sub-optimal decisions. Thus, an absolute risk format should be used.” (60)

Ironically though, the same FDA approved these jabs based on their misleading presentation of efficacy rates. Maybe less ironic when we consider that Pfizer paid the FDA $2,875,842 as a “Prescription Drug User Fee”... (61)

While they did their best to make the Covid19 jab's efficacy rate (a reduction in positive cases compared to placebo group) look sexy, Pfizer's 6 months report data shows an increase in illness and deaths among the inoculated, compared to the placebo group. That begs the obvious question: what's the benefit of a reduction in cases of a virus with an IFR of 0.05% for the general population, if it comes at the cost of increased sickness and death?!

Update:

In September 2021, a group called Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency (PHMPT) filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request with the FDA to obtain the documentation used to approve the Pfizer (BNT162b2) inoculation. After the FDA refused to respond to the FOIA request, the PHMPT filed a lawsuit. Pfizer and the FDA then asked a federal judge to give them 75 years to release all the documents (doling out just 500 pages per month). Thankfully, the judge ruled that they have to release them at a rate of 55,000 pages per month. During mid-November 2021, the FDA released the first 91 pages, which revealed the FDA has been aware of shocking safety issues since April 30, 2021. From the newly released “confidential” Pfizer documents, it has become clear that within the 1st 3 months of administration of their jabs (by February 28, 2021), Pfizer received 42,086 adverse event reports, including 1,223 deaths! (62)

Due to the massive propaganda machine behind these 'vaccines', people have been conditioned to believe that by rolling up their sleeves, they are actually serving the 'greater good'. For a vaccination program to serve and protect the collective public health, it needs to, a) ensure that the individual who is vaccinated is rendered immune from the disease in question; and, b) that the vaccine inhibits transmission of the disease. Contrary to what your government has been telling you, the scientific fact is that none of the Covid19 jabs actually offers immunity or inhibit transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2. (63)

Update:

Recent research data actually proves the opposite to be more accurate: those who have been jabbed are more susceptible to the new variants of Covid, while natural immunity is robust to ALL variants of Covid. A study published in August 2021, Comparing SARS-CoV-2 natural immunity to vaccine-induced immunity, demonstrated that "natural immunity confers longer lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalization caused by the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, compared to the BNT162b2 two-dose vaccine-induced immunity". They actually found the inoculated had a 13.06-fold increased risk for breakthrough infection with the Delta variant compared to those previously infected. (64)

Data from Public Health England showed that up to August 15, 2021, 58% of Covid patients admitted to hospital aged 50 or above, had already received two doses of Covid injections, and 10% received one. Among the Covid deaths in the over 50 age group, 70% were either partially or fully 'vaccinated'. (65) Furthermore, since the 'vaccinated' are less aware of having symptoms of Covid19, they are more likely to continue with their normal daily activities while being infected, and therefore become “super-spreaders”, according to Dr. Robert Malone, inventor of the mRNA technology. This statement is supported by Geert Vanden Bossche, as well as a study from the CDC and State Health Department scientists published in August 2021.

So how does the RNA injections actually work then? In theory the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA shots, and Janssen’s vector DNA shot, all inject lab created mRNA into the body, which tricks the body into creating the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. This in turn triggers an immune response to produce antibodies. A two step process. RNA is an abbreviation for ribonucleic acid and is present in all living cells. The messenger RNA (mRNA) used in the Covid19 vaccines are however not natural, but synthetic. To protect mRNA molecules from the body’s natural defenses, drug developers must wrap them in a protective casing, for which they used PEGylated lipid nanoparticles. PEG is known to cause anaphylaxis (a rapidly progressing, life-threatening allergic reaction affecting many body systems), which has been reported in a minority of those who received the Covid jabs. (67)

Catastrophic effects of the Covid jabs

The side-effects of PEG is however not the only problem with these mRNA shots. Far from it. Many experts have warned since 2020 that mRNA injections are gene-therapy, and holds huge longterm health risks for recipients. One of those who've spoken out, Dr. Judy Mikovits, Ph.D., explains that with the mRNA technology “you’re injecting the blueprint of the virus and letting a compromised system try to deal with it. And worse, it doesn’t go in the cells that a natural infection would, that have lock and key receptors [...] so that only certain cells can be infected, like the upper respiratory tract for a coronavirus. Now you’re making it in a nanoparticle which means it can go in every cell without that receptor.” There is therefore no way to know which cells the mRNA will end up going to, and once the production of spike protein has started, there is no data on how long the body will be producing this for... (68)

Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, an award winning researcher and former head of the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene in Germany, and a professor of virology and microbiology for 30 years, echoed similar dramatic warnings. He confirms that the Covid jabs give the Covid spike protein access to parts of the body via the blood, the virus would never have had access to. The cells which receive the messenger RNA are then going to start making, not the whole virus, but the virus protein (the spike). Dr Bhakdi further explains that while this is suppose to stimulate the creation of anti-bodies to the virus, “these anti-bodies are in the blood, and not on the surface of the airway epithelium”, and will therefore not prevent viral infection of the lungs. His bigger concern is the response of the 2nd arm of the natural immune response to viral infection, namely the killer-lymphocytes. These killer-lymphocytes are trained to recognize and memorize coronaviruses, and will attack and destroy those cells in the body which harbor the spike protein, as they are regarded as infected. This is an autoimmune attack which causes clots (both macro- and micro-thrombi), in as many organs as where the mRNA might have reached (heart, lung, liver, spleen, etc). (69)

In 2020 Canadian immunologist and vaccine researcher Byram Bridle, Ph.D. was awarded a $230,000 government grant for research on Covid vaccine development. As part of that research, he and a team of international scientists requested a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) access to Pfizer’s biodistribution study on animals, from the Japanese regulatory agency. The research, previously unseen, demonstrates a huge problem with all Covid19 vaccines. “We made a big mistake,” Bridle says. “We have known for a long time that the spike protein is a pathogenic protein, [...] a toxin, [and] can cause damage in our body if it gets into circulation.” Many studies have shown the most severe effects of SARS-CoV-2 to be blood clotting and bleeding, due to the effects of the spike protein of the virus.

In theory the assumption was that these 'vaccines' stay in the injection site (like other vaccines). The biodistribution study obtained by Bridle shows the Covid spike protein gets into the blood where it circulates for several days post-vaccination, and then accumulates in organs and tissues. “Other than the site of administration, it was highest in the liver, followed by the spleen, adrenal glands and ovaries”, the study's conclusion states. It was furthermore found that if purified spike protein is injected into the blood of research animals, they experience damage to the cardiovascular system, and that the protein can cross the blood-brain barrier and cause damage to the brain. The spike protein in circulation can attach to specific ACE2 receptors on blood platelets and cells that line blood vessels, which “can either cause platelets to clump, and that can lead to clotting [or] it can also lead to bleeding”, Bridle said. (70)

Dr. Robert Malone (inventor of the mRNA technology) has also actively been speaking out about the dangers of the Covid jabs. He says the Covid 'vaccine' can cause an enhanced immune response (cytokine storm) in the 'vaccinated' individual when exposed to the natural coronavirus. He echoes warnings of the damage the spike protein (as the most dangerous part of the virus) causes in the body, and says this is why there have been so many adverse reactions to the Covid 'vaccines', especially coagulation problems. The spike protein “is active in manipulating the biology of the cells that coat the inside of your blood vessels — vascular endothelial cells, in part through its interaction with ACE2, which controls contraction in the blood vessels, blood pressure and other things”, says Dr Malone. (71)

A research study was published in the American Heart Association’s journal Circulation of March 2021, demonstrating that the spike protein associated withSARS-CoV-2 damages endothelial function. (72) In the study, the researchers created a pseudo-virus that contained the spike protein, but not the virus. Using an animal model, they showed that the virus was not necessary to create damage and inflammation. Very important to note is that this study was pre-printed online in December 2020, before the first Covid jabs was administered in the U.S. (73) In other words, before the emergency use authorization jab that injected immune instructions to create this spike protein was first administered, the CDC and FDA were well aware the spike protein was likely to cause damage to the endothelial cells lining the circulatory system.

A second paper was published online on March 8, 2021, which investigated the potential that the spike protein is an inflammagen that can trigger inflammation at cellular level. The researchers suggested that the spike protein was contributing to hyper-coagulation and may result in large micro-clots that have been observed in plasma samples from patients infected with Covid19. (74) A third study published on April 27, 2021, again demonstrated (in an animal model) that exposure to the spike protein alone was enough to induce severe lung damage. (75) Researchers have continued to find how the spike protein, the same one being created by bodies injected with the genetic therapy shot, affects the endothelial cells, and ultimately damages the heart muscle. Yet, there's been no action by governmental agencies to slow the distribution of this genetic experiment...

Update:

Dr Peter McCullough has been speaking out actively about the dangers of the Covid19 jabs: “The last thing you want in your body is one of those [spike proteins], let alone billions of them, because [they] damage the brain, they damage the heart, they damage bone marrow, they can tear up platelets and red blood cells. Very importantly, they damage blood vessels and cause blood clotting.”

He also warns of the uncontrolled production of spike protein, both in terms of quantity and time, as did Dr Mikovits. Dr McCullough quotes a May 2021 paper, Circulating SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Antigen Detected in the Plasma of mRNA-1273 Vaccine Recipients, which was conducted at the Brigham and Women’s Hospital. The study of 13 healthcare workers proved the spike protein circulated in the blood stream for an average of 15 days post-injection, and in one participant the spike was still detectable on day 29. (76)

A June 2021 research paper by Bruce Patterson from Stanford, showed the S1 portion of the spike protein remains detectable for up to 15 months after you recover from Covid19. This certainly explains the long-Covid syndrome many people have suffered. Dr McCullough remarks that Bruce Patterson also continues to find the whole spike protein - both the S1 and S2 segments – in patients who got the Covid jab, months after the injection.

Covid jabs found to contain graphene

Researchers from Spain found that the Pfizer BioNTech 'vaccines' contain toxic levels of the substance graphene oxide. This team of researchers from the University of Almeria’s Department of Engineering started studying the Covid19 jabs after the emergence of the magnetic injection site phenomenon, of which there are millions of videos from around the globe of inoculated people with metallic objects or magnets sticking to their jab site. They found “enormous doses” of graphene oxide in each dose of the Pfizer vaccine they examined (around 747 nanograms).

This of course was not mentioned on the Emergency Use Authorisation (EUA) fact sheet which states the Pfizer jab to contain the following ingredients: mRNA, lipids ((4-hydroxybutyl) azanediyl) bis(hexane-6,1-diyl) bis(2-hexyldecanoate), 2 [(polyethyleneglycol)-2000]-N, N-ditetradecylacetamide,1, 2-Distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine, and cholesterol), potassium chloride, monobasic potassium phosphate, sodium chloride, dibasic sodium phosphate dihydrate, and sucrose.

Graphene oxide can cause liver and kidney damage, encourage the formation of granulomas in the lungs, decrease cell viability, and trigger pre-programmed cell death. The substance can also cause blood clots as it coagulates the blood, as well as alters immune system response by disrupting the oxidative balance in the body’s glutathione reserves. Animal studies have shown that injection of graphene oxide in the body deposits the toxic substance in the lungs, liver, spleen, and kidneys. (78, 79)

Update:

During the latter half of 2021 and early 2022, at least 4 other research teams from distinct parts of the globe found the vials of Covid-19 'vaccines' to contain items that are not on the declared list of components. Dr. Pablo Campra Madrid's team from Chile, Dr. Matt Shelton from New Zealand Doctors Speaking Out With Science , Dr. Martín Monteverde's team from Argentina, and Dr. Andreas Noack, a German chemist, all found graphine and nanotechnology in the Covid vials they analyzed. (106, 107)

Dr. Andreas Noack, a leading authority in Europe on graphene, posted a video on the 23rd of November 2021, in which he exposes the presence of graphene in the Covid vials. He is of the opinion it was actually graphene hydroxide and not graphene oxide, which Delgado's team discovered in the Covid vials. Dr Noack further explains that these graphene molecules are extremely stable, not biodegradable, and are about 50nm long but only 0.1 nm thick. “These nanoscale structures can best be described as razor blades. These razor blades are injected into the body […], will circulate in the blood and cut up the epithelium (of blood vessels).” This is basically Russian roulette says Dr Noack. "If you perform an autopsy on the victims, you will not find anything, [as] toxicologists do their tests in Petri dishes. [...] People bleed to death on the inside. Especially the top athletes who are dropping dead, have fast flowing blood. The faster the blood flows, the more damage the razors will do.” Three days after posting this revealing video, Dr Noack mysteriously died. His wife believes he was murdered... (108, 109)

Among nanomaterials used for biomedical applications, graphene-based materials have attracted lots of scientific and technological interest over the last decade. Graphene is a 2D carbon nanomaterial which has unique mechanical, electronic, and optical or electrochemical signaling properties. A study published in the NIH's National Library of Medicine in June 2019 (The application of graphene-based biomaterials in biomedicine) states that “graphene-based nanomaterials also serve as the transducer to convert chemical information regarding the interactions between the receptor and the target molecules into a measurable signal”. (110)

The significance of graphene in the Covid vials becomes more apparent once you know of the big nano-technological discovery Rice University announced in 2016. While experimenting with the effect of Tesla coils and single-walled carbon nanotubes, they found the tubes automatically arranged themselves into conductive, wire-like structures, once they were hit by the "Teslaphoretic field". The scientists termed this phenomenon Teslaphoresis. “While Teslaphoresis has the distinct advantage of unrestricted directed self-assembly at a distance”, they also found the near-field energy of the Tesla coil wirelessly powers and self-assembles nanotube circuits, as well as remotely self-assembles parallel arrays of individual nanotubes, “from the bottom-up". Not unlike a biological organism. (111, 112)

https://youtu.be/w1d0Lg6wuvc

Teslaphoresis

Adding up the above, it would therefore appear that a potential purpose of graphene in the Covid vials could be to form activated wiring systems within the human body, that can be accessed and controlled by external sources from a distance. Nano-technology for nano-cummunications... Considering the mushrooming of 5G towers in most 1st World cities since the start of Covid in 2020 (and now also in South Africa), it seems highly probable that this forms a central part of the global elite's plan of totalitarian control of all human beings. The Great Reset, as propogated by Klaus Schwab of the WEF in his book with the same name (published in 2010 already), as well as numerous public talks by Schwab's top advisor, Yuval Noah Harrari, makes these plans very clear. You can listen to some of their shocking plans here. We will deal with more of the global elite's 'Reset' plans in a future article. (113)

Covid jab injuries and deaths

So after all these warnings of experts around the world, how have these Covid jabs performed since their roll out in December 2020? VAERS, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System in the USA, is a voluntary reporting system which was developed in 1990 to record vaccine injuries. Its biggest weakness is that only between 1% to 10% of vaccine injuries are actually logged onto VAERS, as a number of pre-Covid studies found. However, the events that end up being recorded are completely legit. Dr McCullough explains: “So doctors and nurses largely fill these out and then they’re submitted and then they actually have to be verified by the Center for Disease Control”, before they accept it as a verified safety report.

Updated official data from VAERS on Covid19 'vaccine' Adverse Events as on 14 January 2022:

Total Reports: 1,053,828
Deaths: 22,193
Hospitalizations: 118,684
Permanently Disabled: 39,150
Fetal deaths: 2,433*

* From pregnant women injected with a Covid19 shot as at 25 November 2021.

More detailed breakouts of the VAERS data can be found here: https://openvaers.com/covid-data

Please take note, the above data is for adverse events in the USA only.

To put the above data in perspective: The average number of adverse event reports after vaccination on VAERS for the past 10 years, has been about 39,000 annually, with an average of 155 deaths. This is for ALL vaccinations combined! For further perspective, as shared by Dr. Carrie Madej in an ebook called The REAL Number of Covid Vaccine Injuries and Deaths, the Swine Flu vaccine of 1976 was pulled off the market due to it causing lots of Guillain Barre paralysis and 25 to 50 deaths. “The usual thing, if a new drug hits the market and there’s five deaths, it gets a black box warning by the FDA. We get to 50 or 60 deaths, that product is off the market”, Dr McCullough confirms. There have been more fetal deaths in the first 11 months since the Covid19 injection roll-outs started, than there have been in the past 30 years following all vaccines...! (82)

Those bound to the mainstream Covid narrative do of course argue over whether it's possible to proof causality. Temporality is one of the 10 Bradford Hill criteria used to establish causal relationship. Dr McCullough points out that there’s a very tight temporality to these shots in most deaths, with half occurring within 48 hours of injection, and 80% within one week of their jab (whether the first, second or third dose). To not see causality in these figures, would be illogical to put it lightly. (83)

In June 2021, Scott McLachlan, Ph.D., from the University of London published an analysis of VAERS death reports concluding that 86% of post-jab deaths could be attributed directly to the shots, with no other explanation for the deaths. McLachlan also found that seniors were more likely to be killed by the Covid jabs. A September 2021 report by Ronald Kostoff, Ph.D., echoed this. He estimates that people aged 65 and older are five times more likely to die of the Covid shot than from Covid19 itself. (84, 85)

Due to the obvious signs of health dangers of these Covid shots that were already apparent in the first quarter of 2021, Dr McCullough along with 56 international scientists published a paper on May 24 in the journal Authorea, SARS-CoV-2 Mass Vaccination: Urgent Questions on Vaccine Safety that Demand Answers from International Health Agencies, Regulatory Authorities, Governments and Vaccine Developers. They demanded the injections be pulled from the market unless or until safety concerns are addressed. Around the world, government driven Covid jab propaganda and roll-outs, have however continued regardless, and thousands more human beings have suffered permanent consequences, either through physical injury, or losing loved ones.

The blatant ignorance of authorities to the facts around Covid jabs, as well as the scientifically validated opinions of top epidemiologists, virologists and doctors mentioned in this paper, leaves no room for any doubts about the existance of an evil agenda... In part 3, I hope to share more insight into the foundational/biological level of this Covid scandal. And God willing, we'll finally get to shedding more light onto the global elite's hidden agenda behind Covid19.

Update:

More than 3,500 research papers have been published over the last 3 years on the serious adverse events (injuries and disabilities) and deaths following Covid19 injections. Probably the most significant of these research papers was published by Dr Denis Rancourt and his team from Canada on the 17th of September 2023. Their maticulous research, which calculated the toxicity of the "vaccine" for all age groups, and was time and location specific, concluded that: "given the number of doses given worldwide [...] 17 million people would have been killed by this vaccine", explained Dr. Rancourt. Due to the strict censorship of his and other counter narrative data still emposed by the mainstream media platforms, you will not see any coverage of this brilliant study. Please follow this link for an interview with Dr Rancourt and his team about their findings.

References:

Coronavirus, Part 3: Dark agenda behind the Covid narrative

Recent Posts

Comments

MISSION STATEMENT